Summary
This paper critically evaluates the emerging Human Centric Lighting (HCL) concept, questioning whether industry claims outpace the current scientific understanding of artificial light's complex effects on human biology. It serves as a cautionary perspective for lighting designers and manufacturers, urging responsible application of HCL principles given significant remaining knowledge gaps.
Key Findings
- The paper argues that widespread HCL marketing claims at Light+Building 2018 lacked sufficient scientific grounding.
- Highlights a fundamental tension between rapid LED/HCL commercialization and the incomplete state of research on artificial lighting's full biological impact on humans.
- No quantitative experimental findings are presented; the paper is a critical commentary rather than an empirical study.
Categories
The Science of Light: Critically examines the scientific basis and current limitations of Human Centric Lighting (HCL) claims in the lighting industry.
Sleep & Circadian Health: Discusses the relationship between artificial lighting, human biology, and circadian health as foundational to HCL concepts.
Author(s)
K Zielinska-Dabkowska
Publication Year
2019
Number of Citations
2
Related Publications
The Science of Light
- Phototransduction by retinal ganglion cells that set the circadian clock
- Color appearance models
- The mammalian circadian timing system: organization and coordination of central and peripheral clocks
- Diminished pupillary light reflex at high irradiances in melanopsin-knockout mice
- Melanopsin is required for non-image-forming photic responses in blind mice
Sleep & Circadian Health
- Phototransduction by retinal ganglion cells that set the circadian clock
- The mammalian circadian timing system: organization and coordination of central and peripheral clocks
- The twoâprocess model of sleep regulation: a reappraisal
- Melanopsin is required for non-image-forming photic responses in blind mice
- Strange vision: ganglion cells as circadian photoreceptors